1. Definition of welfare
Physical health and mental health
The
welfare of an animal is its capacity to avoid suffering and sustain fitness.
Broom (1991) defined “welfare” as referring to the state of the individual
in relation to its environment, which can be measured. Measurements of welfare should be based, not on the presence
or absence of indicators of reduced biological function, (which, in evolutionary
terms, could be considered primary), but on the animal’s feelings or emotions
(Duncan 1996). There is a need to
define welfare not only for our personal understanding, but also for scientific
study and legislation.
Behaviour
is one of the most easily observed indicators of welfare: it provides
information about animals’ needs, preferences and internal states.
The study of normal behaviour can tell us what animals do when
frightened, frustrated, distressed, ill, or in pain, as well as when they have
abundant resources and are free from perdition. No one set of behavioural responses can indicate reduced
welfare, though changes in the frequencies of individual and social behaviours
or suppression of behaviour can do so.
Needs responses and welfare
An
environment is appropriate if it allows the animal to satisfy its needs, such as
needs for a particular resource, or needs to carry out actions whose function is
to obtain an objective (Toates and Jensen 1991, Broom 1996).
These needs can be identified by studies of motivation and by assessing
the welfare of individuals whose needs are not satisfied (Hughes and Duncan
1988a,b, Dawkins 1990, Broom and Johnson 1993).
Unsatisfied needs are often, but not always, associated with bad feelings
whilst satisfied needs may be associated with good feelings, all feelings being
part of biological control mechanisms (Broom 1996).
The
interpretation of measurements of the responses of an animal to variations in
its environment should involve a range of indicators of welfare (Broom 1997).
Single behavioural measurements can give some valid information but
combinations of measures, for example those of behaviour, physiology, injury,
disease and growth, are more likely to allow a true assessment of welfare (Smidt
1983, Broom 1988). Is a response a
single measure of behaviour, a set of measures of behaviour or a comprehensive
range of behaviours (Broom 1997)? If
welfare is to be a usable scientific concept it should be considered to vary
over a range of “good” to “very poor” and hence many aspects of welfare
are relative (Broom 1997).
Costs and benefits in relation to welfare
Any
improvement in welfare is worthwhile to an individual animal whose welfare is
very poor, and is also worthwhile, morally, to people involved in animals.
However improving animal welfare is not just a matter of money but can
also be expressed in terms of human time, energy or social costs (Broom 1994).
Optimal environments may not be financially attainable but they do exist.
The
Five Freedoms
The Five
Freedoms were originally produced by the Brambell Committee in 1965 and were
“An animal should have the freedom to stand up, lie down, turn around, groom
themselves and stretch their limbs”. The
Agricultural Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1968 outlined suffering that it
described as “unnecessary pain or distress”. In 1979 the Farm Animal Welfare Council was formed and
changed the 5 freedoms to:
1.
Freedom from thirst hunger or malnutrition – achieved by readily
accessible fresh water and a diet to maintain full health and vigour
2.
Appropriate comfort and shelter
3.
Freedom from injury and disease – achieved by prevention or rapid
diagnosis and treatment
4.
Freedom of movement and the opportunity to express most normal patterns
of behaviour
5.
Freedom from fear
Summary
The key
to identifying an appropriate environment for animals is the use of an adequate
range of indicators of welfare rather than simple responses.
Studies of motivation in animals give information about the needs of the
animal, as do studies of welfare in animals whose needs are not satisfied.
When welfare improvement is related to costs a full range of costs rather
than just immediate monetary costs should be used.
There is
a trend in public concern about the welfare of animals including horses.
Veterinarians are the experts on disease and injury and they have to
decide whether an animal is suffering from pain or discomfort or distress.
There always seems to be difficulty in deciding on the standards of
behaviour that vets use in assessing suffering animals. There is a need for
clinical-behavioural research, which clearly describes the signs to identify and
quantifies pain, distress and discomfort.
Failures
to cope with the environment and difficulty in coping are both indicators of
poor welfare. Suffering and poor
welfare often occur together, but welfare can be poor without suffering and
welfare should not be defined solely in terms of subjective experiences (Broom
1991).
2. Measures of Welfare
Broom
and Johnson (1993) gave the following list as indicators of poor welfare:
Ø
Reduced life expectancy
Ø
Reduced ability to grow and breed
Ø
Body damage
Ø
Disease
Ø
Immunosuppression (Greater susceptibility to disease)
Ø
Physiological attempts to cope
Ø
Behavioural attempts to cope
Ø
Behavioural pathology
Ø
Behavioural anomalies (apathy or stereotypy)
Ø
Self narcotization
Ø
Extent behavioural aversion shown
Ø
Extent of suppression of normal behaviour
Ø
Extent to which normal physiological processes and anatomical
development are prevented
Houghton-Brown
(1997) included the following:
Ø
Failure to thrive
Ø
Evidence of frustration or reactive fear
Ø
Undue stress and distress
Ø
Unnecessary suffering
Ø
Unwarranted pain
Ø
Unacceptable quality of life
Broom
and Johnson (1993) gave the following list as indicators of good welfare:
Ø
Variety of normal behaviours shown
Ø
Extent to which strongly preferred behaviours can be shown
Ø
Physiological indicators of pleasure
Ø
Behavioural indicators of pleasure
Below is a diagram showing how the measurement of stereotypies can be of significance for welfare (taken from Broom and Johnson 1993).
An
example of this is that calves kept in outdoor yards where they could exercise
had higher plasma creatine kinase levels than those kept in very small pens
(Friend, Dellmeier and Gbour 1985).
Behaviour – stress, stereotypies,
Broom
(1996) said that the welfare of an individual is its state as regards its
attempt to cope with its environment (Duncan 1996).
Physiology
Mental
needs are always of secondary importance to providing an environment that will
ensure good health and a normal physiological and physical state; i.e. the
animal’s physical needs (Duncan and Petherick 1991).
3. Abuse
A
neglected horse is easy to recognise with its overgrown hooves and its ribs
showing but the most insidious forms of abuse leave no outward signs at all.
It is the abuse that is not meant to hurt or cause suffering, but does so
through either ignorance or naiveté. Abuse
is tied up greatly with ethics, whether they are social, professional or
personal. In the last century the
treatment of animals fell under the personal ethics of the owner/handler. There was, if you like, a contract between the animal and
human, with the human “fostering” the animal, protecting it in return for
services. With the boost in
technology and sports science, animals are kept alive and performing in
unnatural conditions. In the
1960’s the government asked the Brambell Commission to study this situation
and it concluded “It is not morally defensible to put animals in environments
in which they are unable to live out their basic nature”.
4.
Welfare
Charities
RSPCA
The
majority of welfare charities are trying to change people’s perception of
animals as a part of society. They
try to shift our view that animals are here for our benefit to thinking we must
be of benefit to them and to shift debate from how much harm we should inflict
to the more fundamental issues of how much good we should do.
The
RSPCA recognise that horses, which are maintained for competition purposes, have
to fulfil a specific training programme in order to achieve the desired standard
of performance. To minimise the
risk of injury between training sessions these horses are often required to
remain in their stables and may not have access to pasture throughout their
working schedule. Valuable horses
kept for breeding proposes must also be carefully looked after and may remain
stabled throughout the day. The
horse may be exposed to an excessive quantity of unfilled time, which can lead
to stereotypies.
The
objects of the Society are to promote kindness and prevent or suppress cruelty
to animals (RSPCA Act 1932). The
general principle is that animals feel pain and experience distress and where
there is doubt, the benefit of the doubt should be given to the animal.
The two particular policies, which are relevant to the issues in this
project, are:
1.1.2
(and 6.2.1) The RSPCA is
opposed to any degree of confinement, which is likely to cause distress or
suffering to the animal concerned.
3.1.1
The RSPCA is opposed to all forms of farming that causes distress or
suffering, or deprive animals of the opportunity to indulge in their natural
behaviour, and believes that farming practices should provide, as nearly as
possible, natural lifestyles for the animals concerned.
The
society sees the welfare of an animal as including its physical and mental state
and considers that good animal welfare implies both fitness and sense of well
being. It also adopts the 5
Freedoms, which it sees as defining the ideal states that should be aimed for.
“Animals need to be kept in a way that is appropriate to the normal
biological requirements of their species, in sufficient space, containing the
necessary shelter, cover and environmental stimulus, so as not to cause distress
or suffering” (RSPCA Policies (1997)).
F.E.I.
- Federation Equestre Internationale Code of Conduct
During
the 1990 World Equestrian Games in Stockholm the FEI decided to issue a Code of
Conduct for all the people involved in the welfare of competition horses, with a
view to educating horse owners and the general public.
The ten statements cover the veterinary health, welfare and care of the
competition horse but the two regarding care are stated below:
I.
“The well being of the horse shall take precedence over the demands of
all interested parties and commercial concerns.”
II.
“The highest standards of nutrition, health, sanitation and safety
shall be encouraged and maintained at all times.”
The
first statement aims to protect horses where there is a temptation to use them
in a way which is damaging to their health or comfort.
The second statement rules that provision of good quality feed and a
clean, plentiful supply of water is mandatory and that stables should be of
suitable proportions, well ventilated, hygienic and sanitary, with conditions
carefully monitored to ensure minimal risk of infection or disease.
Summary
The
equestrian organisations and charities aim to protect horses from abuse and
misuse. The stabling of horses,
although not an abuse issue is arguably a welfare issue due to the owner’s
misunderstanding. The policies of
the RSPCA, and the FEI codes of conduct both state that the horse’s well being
should be paramount, and any degree of suffering should be eliminated. However
it has been shown that horses in stables can be in distress, and that the whole
reason horses are in stables are for the benefit of the owners not the horse.
Should
the welfare charities be doing more to educate people that there are
alternatives to stabling horses and that a horse showing a stereotypy is in
distress? It ought to be the
responsibility of these bodies to educate people in the correct husbandry
practices and stand up for what they believe to be right by their policies and
Codes of Conduct.
Should
they consider what they actually mean by “confinement” in policy 1.1.2?
The meaning is obvious when one considers veal crates and battery cages,
but are they going to have to widen their view and realise that stables can
cause horses just as much suffering as those calves and chickens endure?
Policy 3.1.1 covers farm animals and the law does not regard horses as
farm animals, but horses should not be excluded from this protection just
because they are recreational not production animals.